photo request mig-21 with 6 missiles

Read the forum code of contact

Member for

18 years 8 months

Posts: 620

Who can contribute a MiG-21 loaded 6 missiles in photo? Even MiG-23 only carries 6 how fishbed can be?

Original post

Member for

24 years 8 months

Posts: 7,989

Dual-adaptors for the R-60 I believe.

I've looked into this before, and apparently the Fishbed can carry the dual R-60 launchers on any of the four underwing hardpoints, but the maximum number of missiles the aircraft can carry is six. I think this has to do with weapons control limitations or something of that sort.

Thus, four R-60 and two R-13 or six R-60 is the max number of weapons you would see.

The same limitation applies to the MiG-23 I think (six missiles max).

Since the R-60 is a better weapons than the R-13, it has always surprised me that you don't see more loadouts on the MiG-21 that include four R-60's on dual adaptors plus outboard wing mounted external tanks. Thus you have room for three external tanks and you still get four AAM's. Food for thought anyways....

Here's a picture I have of a Croatian (maybe?) MiG-21 with six R-60's (you can see three, but I'm assuming there are three on the other wing as well).

The second picture I have is of what I think is a Serbian MiG-21 with four R-60's and two R-13's (again, only three missiles are available, but I'm assuming there are six in total.)

Attachments

Since the R-60 is a better weapons than the R-13, it has always surprised me that you don't see more loadouts on the MiG-21 that include four R-60's on dual adaptors plus outboard wing mounted external tanks. Thus you have room for three external tanks and you still get four AAM's. Food for thought anyways....

Personally I think the SARH model R-13s plus 4 R-60Ms would compliment each other. The SARH missiles offer longer range head on capability while the smaller R-60Ms offer an effective missile in a much smaller lighter package. Operationally in real combat I would expect with older model Mig-21s that the SARH and IR combination would be more effective. With a new or upgraded Mig-21 then two R-77s and two R-73s would offer optimum loadouts.

There has been talk of special weapons pylons with additional launch positions for light AAMs with external fuel tanks for the newer fighters. I would expect they would be designed to the same standard and might allow the Mig-21 of the future to have fuel tanks and IR missiles carried at the same time on each pylon. It would likely come down to size to determine whether it was R-60Ms or R-73s and whether one IR missile is carried per pylon in addition to a fuel tank or two.

Armament options for the Mig-21-93 are listed as a max of: 4 x R-77, or 4 x R-73, or 2 x R-27R/T, or 6 x R-60M. Or combinations... ie 2 x R-77 and 2 x R-73, or 1 x R-27R and 1 x R-27T and 2 x R-77, or 2 x R-77 and 4 x R-60M.

Member for

21 years

Posts: 10,217

Here's a picture I have of a Croatian (maybe?) MiG-21 with six R-60's (you can see three, but I'm assuming there are three on the other wing as well).

The second picture I have is of what I think is a Serbian MiG-21 with four R-60's and two R-13's (again, only three missiles are available, but I'm assuming there are six in total.)

First one is Serbian AFTER split with Montenegro. Second one is Serbian, too, but couple of years earlier (with Montenegro) ;) I know, the whole Balkan issue is damn confusing ever for us, Europeans..

Member for

17 years 4 months

Posts: 402

You are quite right flex about this. To be more exact left picture was taken just after "divorce" of Serbia and Montenegro and is a Fishbed on QRA while the one on the right is taken in 1997 from an air show held in Batajnica Air Base. The country was called then Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (until 2003 when it was renamed to Serbia and Montenegro).
Here is my little contribution. First one represents a MiG-21 bis on QRA some 20 years ago or so, in then Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia with 2 R-13 and 4 R-60, while the second one should be again from the air show that was held in 1997.

Attachments

Member for

18 years 2 months

Posts: 927

it has always surprised me that you don't see more loadouts on the MiG-21 that include four R-60's on dual adaptors plus outboard wing mounted external tanks. Thus you have room for three external tanks and you still get four AAM's. Food for thought anyways....

Here's one:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Weapons/AAMs/R60/R-60B.jpg.html
You don't see them that often because it is a very draggy loadout, plus the space between them is mighty small, might not be an operational loadout - remember that thread abouth the MiG-23BN with 500 kg bombs on the fuselage pylons and centerline fuel tank?

Member for

24 years 8 months

Posts: 7,989

Sorry I confused my insignias, but flex was kinda to correct me. Thanks flex.

Anyways, I agree the SARH R-13 and four R-60 loadout does make sense, but I guess I was thinking that the SARH R-13 (and the R-13 in general) isn't as common now as it previously was. It would seem a modern replacement would be a weapon in the class or the Derby, but I don't suppose there are any Fishbeds with Derby right now.

Member for

18 years 2 months

Posts: 927

Theoretically, Romanian MiG-21 Lancer C (those with the white-gray camo) could support Derby. They have Elta EL-2032 radars and the inboard pylons are wired for Python III. Only a software update and the missiles plus rails would be needed.
Anyway, there is no need (nor funds) for Derby in peacetime QRA, so you won't see them on our MiGs.

Member for

18 years 8 months

Posts: 620

So I believe Fishbed can loads 8 missiles if situation need according to both inboard and outboard pylons can carried 2 missiles.:eek:

Member for

18 years 2 months

Posts: 927

So I believe Fishbed can loads 8 missiles if situation need according to both inboard and outboard pylons can carried 2 missiles.:eek:

No, it can't. Its fire-control computer can only handle 6 missiles maximum. That's why you'll never see a Fishbed with 8 Aphids on dual launchers.

Member for

17 years

Posts: 167

No, it can't. Its fire-control computer can only handle 6 missiles maximum. That's why you'll never see a Fishbed with 8 Aphids on dual launchers.

Let's not forget the fuel issue. If you want any worth while range you must carry at least one 480 liter tank and even then you have very limited duration. Even if it was possible to carry 8 missiles I don't think it would make sense to carry more than 4 missiles on a point defense fighter with such limited range as the MiG-21. The most advanced Fishbeds in service at the moment are the Indian Bisons since they can carry BVR missiles and guided bombs (and guided A2G missiles as well?). I have seen them carrying:

  • 2xR73, 2xR77, 1x480 liter tank
  • 2xR73, 2x480 liter tank
  • 2xR77, 2x480 liter tank
  • 2xR73, 2x480 liter tank, KAB-500 TV guided bomb

For even greater range it might be possible to carry:

  • 2xR73, 3x480 liter tank
  • 2xR77, 3x480 liter tank

I don't know if this is possible:

  • 2xR73, 2xR77, 1x800 liter tank

I know there used to be a 800 liter tank available for the Fishbed but I haven't seen it used all that often. The 480 liter unit seems to be much more popular. Chinese PLAAF and PLANAF operated F-7 fighters in particular quite often carry the scaled up 720 liter tank.

Member for

18 years 2 months

Posts: 927

I know there used to be a 800 liter tank available for the Fishbed but I haven't seen it used all that often.

The 800 liter tank is not particulary popular among Fishbed pilots, reportedly the MiG is a bit heavy on the control and less responive with it attached, especially if you also have stores on the wings.

Not 100% sure but I seem to remember that the 800L tank made the aircraft subsonic only. I remember someone mentioning that when the Mig-29 first got wing tanks they were the 800l tanks of the Mig-21 and it reduced performance even more than the centreline tank... which was just for ferrying so it probably imposes a g limit as well.
Obviously for a longer range mission the tank will be dumped and therefore that doesn't matter of course, but during peace time it would certainly be an issue.