Read the forum code of contact
By: - 21st April 2006 at 01:42 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
A tad morbid on behalf of JAL one would think
By: - 21st April 2006 at 01:54 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
I think it is a good idea actually.
Its will show what can cause a crash and also show the lessons learned. Above all, it will show how much safer air travel is because of Jal 123 and other crashes.
By: - 21st April 2006 at 07:38 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
It was Boeings fault for the crash anyway so Flight 123 couldn't/can't be blamed on JAL,
Wozza
By: - 21st April 2006 at 12:25 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
I saw the programme Air Crash Investigation on satellite TV yesterday, focusing on this very incident.
Indeed Boeing's repair of the initial tailscrape incident was at fault.
Was a very realistic depiction of the tragedy in 1985.
However Japanair obviously feel their staff today (new generation) have become complacent, and need to be reminded of what could happen if standards slip.
Posts: 664
By: CWBalmer - 21st April 2006 at 00:06
Interesting reading...
Japan Airlines (JAL), working to recover from much-publicised safety troubles over the past year, has established a permanent centre that includes wreckage from its last fatal accident in a move designed to raise flight safety awareness among employees.
The carrier says in a statement that the Safety Promotion Centre is scheduled to open on 24 April and it has been created in response to a recommendation from a group of independent experts hired last year.
JAL says it has spent ¥180 million ($1.5 million) to set up the facility, which is located in the maintenance district of Tokyo’s Haneda Airport and which has a staff of three people. It is part of a new Corporate Safety Division that was established on 1 April as “the core organisation responsible for safety of the JAL Group”.
The airline, Asia’s largest, has not had a fatal accident since 1985 but over the past year public confidence in JAL has deteriorated and many Japanese travellers have switched their business to rival All Nippon Airways. Early last year the Japanese government publicly issued JAL an unprecedented "business improvement order" that was the result of a series of safety violations and since then even minor operational incidents involving the carrier make headlines in Japan.
JAL says exhibits in the 620m2 (6,700sq ft) display space include “photographs, charts and other items from a JAL 747 accident in August 1985”. The 747SR-46, in high density seating configuration, was operating as flight 123 between Tokyo and Osaka when its rear pressure bulkhead failed, severing hydraulic lines. The cockpit crew struggled to control the aircraft and it eventually crashed into the ridge of Mount Takamagahara 100 km (60miles) from Tokyo, killing more than 500 people.
The airline says items on display at the Safety Promotion Centre include “the flight data recorder, cockpit voice recorder and seats from the aircraft”. In addition, “a major exhibit is the rear pressure bulkhead from the aircraft”.
“Documentation and information providing case histories of accidents and incidents for reference and study are compiled at the centre in an archive, available for reference at any time. The centre’s displays and documents will be used for employee education and training and will also be available to serious researchers outside the company,” JAL adds.
“The centre displays information on all accidents JAL has been involved in since its founding and also includes materials showing what other airlines in Japan and throughout the world have learned from accidents, and how they have applied their learning to improve safety.”
A spokesman for the airline, which plans to join the Oneworld alliance next year, says the centre was set up for employee use but members of the public may be allowed in “on application”.