Should rare and historic aircraft be allowed to fly?

Pilot Dave Unwin assesses the pros and cons of allowing historic aircraft to continue flying

Over the last few years several high-profile accidents involving historic aircraft have reignited the perennial debate regarding whether old aircraft should be allowed to fly and also carry passengers.

Of course they should! An aeroplane in a museum is nothing more than a disparate collection of metal, fabric, rubber and plastic — it’s just a dust-covered artefact, whereas an airworthy aircraft in its natural element is virtually a living thing. In his seminal book The Log from the Sea of Cortez, John Steinbeck observed that a boat can warp a man’s psyche, and how ‘the sight of a boat riding in the water clenches a fist of emotion in his chest’. He also wrote that ‘a boat, above all other inanimate things, is personified in man’s mind.’ A classic aircraft has the same effect — but only when it is ‘alive’.

Become a Premium Member to Read More

This is a premium article and requires an active Key.Aero subscription to view.

I’m an existing member, sign me in!

I don’t have a subscription…

Enjoy the following subscriber only benefits:

  • Unlimited access to all KeyAero content
  • Exclusive in-depth articles and analysis, videos, quizzes added daily
  • A fully searchable archive – boasting hundreds of thousands of pieces of quality aviation content
  • Access to read all our leading aviation magazines online - meaning you can enjoy the likes of FlyPast, Aeroplane Monthly, AirForces Monthly, Combat Aircraft, Aviation News, Airports of the World, PC Pilot and Airliner World - as soon as they leave the editor’s desk.
  • Access on any device- anywhere, anytime
  • Choose from our offers below